Page 1 of R Kelly aquitted of all Child Porn charges

Quote:
The verdict came six years after the R&B superstar was first charged with videotaping himself having sex with a young girl. Prosecutors had said she was as young as 13 at the time...

Both Kelly and the now 23-year-old alleged victim had denied they were the ones appearing on the tape, which was played for the jury at the beginning and end of the trial.

Over seven days presenting their case, prosecutors called 22 witnesses, including several childhood friends of the alleged victim and four of her relatives who identified her as the female on the video.

In two days, the Grammy winner`s lawyers called 12 witnesses. They included three relatives of the alleged victim who testified they did not recognize her as the female on the tape.


The jury still had to watch the video twice - just to make sure
============================
Curse this infernal alcohol...


Writer`s Release
My Collection

This item was edited on Friday, 13th June 2008, 20:31

WOW......................... Guess how much it cost him !?

Did you know he was free to do his `Stuff` for about 6 years before court ?!?!?!?!

GREAT LAWYERS EH ?!!??

PS And I BET he gave a `FEW` bucks to the girl to keep quiet !?

Who`s to say he`s not innocent?
He has after all been acquitted.

"Build a man a fire, and he`ll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he`ll be warm for the rest of his life."
-Terry Pratchett.

Quote:
WOW......................... Guess how much it cost him !?
Did you know he was free to do his `Stuff` for about 6 years before court ?!?!?!?!
GREAT LAWYERS EH ?!!??
PS And I BET he gave a `FEW` bucks to the girl to keep quiet !?

You should write headlines for the Sunday Sport

============================
Curse this infernal alcohol...


Writer`s Release
My Collection

Too many syllables.

er......Right ???

Well, I think that R. Kelly should get the chair just for this (or some sort of unintentional comedy medal)

---

Even if it was him you can`t stop someone earning a living just because they have been charged with something - unless, of course, they have been remanded in custody. Innocent until proven guilty.

Nick

I couldn`t care less how you type, I just get really p***ed off that as soon as a celebrity, haven travelled through the due process off the law and been found not guilty, is immediately assumed to have paid off the jury, judge, witnesses, and only got off because he had a high-priced laywer, and is, in fact, completely guilty of everything because `I said so`.

Craig Charles springs to mind

============================
Curse this infernal alcohol...


Writer`s Release
My Collection

Maybe the lawyer used the Chewbacca defense?

UQ Web Design ¦ Offensive 101